| Footprints™
FAQ
Q:
Why do I get a "Settings File Missing" error when I try to launch Footprints?
A:
The "settings.dat" file
must reside either in the same folder as "footprints.exe" or in a folder specified
via a command line parameter. See below for a discussion of the latter approach.
Back
to Top
Q:
Can I share Footprints over a network with my co-workers?
A:
Yes, we recommend doing this and assigning one user the
task of updating the shared executable as newer versions become
available; users will have the ability to customize their own "settings.dat" file. Follow this procedure: 1) Have each user install the software on their PC.
2) Have one user copy "Footprints.exe" and "settings.dat" onto the network. 3) Have each user REMOVE Footprints from their PC using "FootprintsInstaller.msi". 4) Have each user create a new shortcut on their Desktop for the shared executable on the network.
5) Have each user copy the shared settings file to their PC.
6) Have each user modify the shortcut properties such that the Target reads exe-network-path dat-PC-path. For example:
W:\apps\Footprints\Footprints.exe C:\Program Files\Footprints\settings.dat
If users are on terminals (no PCs - just networked monitors with all processing and storage on one shared server) the system administrator should be able to store the DAT files under each User Profile.
Back
to Top
Q:
Why are your HID photometric files rated at 1000 lumens?
What should I do to correct this?
A:
This is called “prorating”, and is actually a fairly common
practice among luminaire manufacturers. There are really two reasons
we prorate. First, luminaire manufacturers generally avoid showing
a preference for particular lamp manufacturers, and using a generic
(and arbitrary) value like “1000” is one means of preserving anonymity.
Second, the value that pops-up in the “Lumens” input field of
your lighting software should not (whether prorated or not) be
simply accepted as-is, but rather changed to the lumen rating
for the lamp you intend to use as published by the lamp manufacturer.
These ratings are readily available online and in catalogs. Never
use a text editor to modify the data contained in the IES-format photometric file itself.
Back
to Top
Q:
Where the heck did I just send my printed template?
A:
Your default printer. We have assumed that the vast majority
of users have set their default printer to a black-and-white,
8.5" by 11" paper machine. If you'd like to designate another printer as your default Footprints™ printer, follow this procedure:
1) On the task bar choose Start-Settings-Printers, right-click on the desired printer, and select "Set as Default Printer".
2) Launch Footprints™ (you must close and re-launch if already open), go to Tools-Settings-Printing and set the new printer as default, and File-Save to retain this change.
3) Go back to Start-Settings-Printers (on the task bar) and undo your default printer change. Now Footprints™ will have its own default printer!
Back
to Top
Q:
How do I center the printed output on an 8.5 x 11 inch page?
A:
From the "Template Specification" screen go to Tools-Settings and adjust the Shift values under "Printing" to best suit your printer.
Back
to Top
Q:
Why don't the gridlines in the background show up when I print?
A:
Is your "Show When Printing" box checked? If so, please contact us
and we will attempt to resolve the problem. If it isn't checked, check it... (Duh.)
Back
to Top
Q:
I want to use a 350W metal halide lamp, but you've only got IES files for 250 and 400W. What should I do?
A:
Use the 400W test for the same optical system and change
the lumens to 350W as described in a preceding Q&A. It would
not be reasonable to expect a luminaire manufacturer to pay for
tests of every available lamp. We would have to test for every
lamp manufacturer (at least 4) and every model (standard, super,
pulse-start, ceramic, etc.) offered for that wattage, yielding
something like 16 tests. Further, lamps are continually being
modified, so you’d have to retest after every change and for every
new model. And that’s for just one housing-distribution-lamp combination...
It is generally more conservative to use a higher-wattage test.
(Better 400W than 250W in this case.) Since HID optics are generally
designed around a point source, performance generally worsens
with increased arc tube size – it’s better to err on the safe
side. Make sure that everything else remains constant: reflector,
lens, etc. A larger housing will often have its own (larger) reflector
for a given distribution, and increased wattage can require the
use of a sag lens. NEVER use a coated-lamp test to model clear-lamp
performance, or vice-versa; similarly, it's generally NOT a good idea to use HPS to represent MH (dissimilar arc-tube geometry), or vice-versa.
Back
to Top
Q:
Why do you only allow 3 isolines for the default "Factors
of 2" isoline preference?
A:
This is done to encourage proper template usage. Only two
lines are generally needed, one at the target minimum and another
at half this value. A third line at one-fourth the target minimum
can be useful in a rectilinear four-pole layout, but otherwise
only contributes visual clutter. The "Specified" option allows
as many as 7 isolines at whatever values the user desires.
Back
to Top
Q:
Isn't it possible to create a template that can be used
for any mounting height?
A:
Yes, if you show a background grid in units of mounting
height and give a table showing isoline values for various mounting
heights. For example, say you've created a template for 30' to
lens, with curves shown for 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 fc and labeled
A, B, and C, respectively. One row in the table would show these
original fc values and mounting height, and additional rows would show
higher values for lower heights and lower values for
greater heights. These additional fc values are found
by multiplying the original fc value by the square of the ratio
of original height to the new height. Refer to the Gullwing Applications
Guide for an example of proper implementation of this approach.
That said, there are two reasons not to do this. First, if you
have software that can generate templates as you need them, why
store any? Second, such a "universal" template is extremely limited
in it's utility: You're stuck with the isolines you chose the
first time around. In the above example, if you want to design
to 1.0 fc minimum with a 35' height, you'll have to guess the
size and shape of the 1.0 fc curve based on the curve now valued
at 0.73 fc.
Back
to Top
Q:
Why don't you report the average?
A:
To calculate the average you must determine the boundaries
of the area of interest. A calculation of the average for the
area covered by the square grid or the area "covered" by the template
would be meaningless. Further, an average calculation usually
considers contribution from neighboring luminaires; this is beyond
the scope of a template generator.
Back
to Top
Q:
Why do other template generators produce different templates
for the same input data?
A:
There are several possible explanations for discrepancies
between template generators, the two most likely being grid resolution
and interpolation method. Our calculation grid spacing is simply
one-tenth the optical height. This provides a high degree of resolution,
while keeping the maximum calculated value independent of drawing
scale. Other template generators sacrifice accuracy to reduce
calculation time (via grid size) for low optical height / large
scale combinations. An explanation of our interpolation algorithm
would be very lengthy, but you can check its relative accuracy
with an exercise like the following: In Footprints™
print this IES
file with 40000 lumens, 0.8 LLF, 32' height, 1.5' arm,
no tilt, 30' scale, and 3 isolines for a 1.0 fc minimum. Repeat
this with another template generator. Finally, do the same in
AGI32® (or similar point-by-point software), but then create a
calculation grid with twice our resolution (spacing = 1/20th the
height = 1.6') and show isolines for the grid rather than
simply creating a template for the luminaire. We believe you'll
agree that Footprints™ outperforms other template
generators.
Back
to Top
Q:
When I insert my DXF into a site plan DWG, the template is clearly out of proportion: Either much too large or far too small. What's going on?
A:
There are two possible explanations. The first involves units. DXF output from Footprints™ is in "Decimal" (feet) units; if your site plan is in "Architectural" (inches) units, simply "scale" the template by a factor of 12.
Otherwise, the drawing entities in the site plan DWG have been scaled in a clumsy attempt to plot to scale. The "dist" command in AutoCAD should ALWAYS reveal accurate dimensions for entities in model space, but some users will, due to inadequate understanding of the software, actually shrink their (electronic) drawing entities by a factor of 1/20 to get their plotter to draw at 1"=20' scale! So to make your templates work on such a distorted site plan, you can either follow suit or correct their DWG. If you scale your template, make sure the background grid still makes sense...
Back
to Top
Q:
Why is FootprintsInstaller trying to load when I launch Footprints?
A:
Have you recently relocated "Footprints.exe" to another folder? This is the most likely cause. The best way to resolve this is to simply remove and reinstall the software.
Back
to Top
Feel
free to contact our Applications
Engineers (1-800-227-0758) if you need further assistance.
|
